Adams v. Bartlett
Bartlett sued Adams in an action of assumpsit. Adams contested the validity of a capias writ, but the circuit court denied Adams's assertion. Both parties waived a jury, and a bench trial led to a judgment in favor of Bartlett. Adams appealed, arguing the denial of the motion to discharge bail. The Illinois Supreme Court upheld the judgment, asserting that the motion's outcome wouldn't have changed the trial's result.
Adams v. Payson
Payson sued Adams to foreclose a mortgage after Adams failed to pay on a promissory note. Adams defaulted, and the court ruled for Payson. The judgment included a $30 payment for Payson's attorney fee. Adams appealed the ruling on the attorney fee. The Supreme Court modified the decree. The Court ruled that Payson's attorney fee was not claimed in the bill, it could not be enforced. Therefore, the decree regarding the fee was overturned. Other parts of the decree remained upheld with costs borne by Adams.